<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Polynomial on Understanding the Riemann Hypothesis</title>
    <link>https://riemannhypothesis.blog/tags/polynomial/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Polynomial on Understanding the Riemann Hypothesis</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <managingEditor>markus@recommend.games (Markus Shepherd)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>markus@recommend.games (Markus Shepherd)</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 21:29:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://riemannhypothesis.blog/tags/polynomial/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>More symmetry and Another Product</title>
      <link>https://riemannhypothesis.blog/2013/12/more-symmetry-and-another-product/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 21:29:17 +0000</pubDate><author>markus@recommend.games (Markus Shepherd)</author>
      <guid>https://riemannhypothesis.blog/2013/12/more-symmetry-and-another-product/</guid>
      <description>We&amp;rsquo;ve seen that \(\zeta(s)\) satisfies the functional equation&#xA;\[ \zeta(1-s)=2^{1-s}\pi^{-s}\cos(\pi s/2)\Pi(s-1)\zeta(s). \]&#xA;(Well, it still needs to be proved, but let&amp;rsquo;s just assume it&amp;rsquo;s correct for now.) The goal of this post is an even more symmetrical form that will yield the function \(\xi(s)\) which we can develop into an incredibly useful product expression.&#xA;On our wish list for \(\xi(s)\) we find three items:&#xA;It&amp;rsquo;s an entire function, i.e., a function that&amp;rsquo;s holomorphic everywhere in \(\mathbb{C}\) without any poles.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
